A Socialists Rant against Capitalism That Likely Cost Him His Life Essay

A Socialists Rant against Capitalism That Likely Cost Him His Life - study ExampleInstead of consistently pleading his innocence in the Haymarket bombing in Chicago, Engel converted his line of descent into a battle between socialism and capitalist economy. In order to tear down the United States exercise of government and economy democracy and capitalism Engel blamed the hardship and oppression of every workingman on the capitalistic machine. Engel used his plea to the States Attorney to promote his own holy persons, rather than focusing on his alibi to disprove the perpetrators false accusations against him. Engel took the stage as the champion of the poor, pleading that prosperous capitalists were the root of their end who must be crushed by the united workingman. Engel, like socialists Karl Marx and Joseph Stalin, made everything black and white in his appeal for support, portraying the freedom fighting proletariat as good and altruistic, while characterizing the oppositio n in this case, the tyranny of capitalism as wicked, oppressive, conspiring, and slave-inducing. Engel used his address as a vehicle to attack capitalism and promote socialism more(prenominal) than his own innocence an ineffective transitory argument that more than in altogether probability cost him his life. Not until more than halfway into his address does Engel press his plea to denounce the murder energise against him for conspiracy in the bombing, of which he claimed to have no part. He and his fellow anarchists faced the gallows or geezerhood of servitude for their involvement in the massacre (Engel). But, for ideological reasons, Engel made what should have been his primary argument his secondary argumentation ? that the charges against him were baseless and ill-conceived. This assertion of innocence goes down in history as having merit, but instead of at once attacking those specifically responsible for framing him, Engel contended that capitalist rule was at faul t behind all that had gone awry. If Engel would have contained his attack to the particular capitalists involved in the plot, he could have likely met a different fate. In a republic that quickly rose to world prominence by 1886 as a result of its democratic and capitalistic form of government, Engels case against it was not only unpopular at the time it was extremely hard to prove. To denounce the perpetrators of the scheme against him and his fellow socialists, Engel made sweeping generalizations against capitalism, label it a tyrannical, repressive, and wicked system used to make the rich richer and the poor poorer. Effectively side-stepping the fact that legion(predicate) immigrants came from Europe with nothing to become successful entrepreneurs in America, Engel depicted capitalism and democracy as slight more than a vehicle and guise for slave labor. Unable to provide success stories of socialism in other nations, Engels unconvincingly promoted the questionable economic an d political system as the only utopian ideal worth fighting for. Today, in retrospect, one only needs to revisit the numerous socialist regimes that saturnine into communist dictatorships ? such as the one started by the Russian Revolution of 1917 ? to understand the true dangers of socialism. With more than 20 million murdered under Stalins socialist ideals, Engels call to violently squeeze out the capitalists is taken with an even greater grain of salt today especially with George Orwells widely prove and colorful depiction in Animal Farm that divulges the corruption of socialism/communism and its